The Cosmetic Record

Cosmetic facts, with the document attached.

Every claim here links to a document you can open.

Corrections

A site that claims a document behind every sentence has to show what happens when the sentence turns out to be wrong. This is that page.

How a correction reads

  1. An error of fact is fixed in the article and logged here, with the date, the page, what the sentence said and what it says now. A corrected sentence is struck through, not removed, so that a reader can see what changed, and each entry has an anchor of the form /corrections/#2026-08-06-launch.
  2. A substantive correction also gets a dated note at the foot of the article itself, under Corrections to this article, linking back to the entry here. You should not have to visit this page to learn that the page you are reading changed.
  3. Typographical errors and broken links are fixed silently and not logged. Logging a fixed apostrophe would bury the entries that matter.
  4. A regulation changing under an article is an update, not a correction. It is labelled as such, because the article was not wrong — the law moved. Both kinds live in the same list so the history reads in one pass, and each entry says which it is.

To raise something, write to the contact form — say which page, which sentence, and what the document actually says. A request is judged on the document it cites.

The log

Most recent first. One entry.

· Record

This site replaced an unrelated Portuguese-language blog at this address

Date
Page affected
Every address on this domain.
What this address used to say
Until December 2016, testandoprodutoscosmeticos.com carried a Brazilian Portuguese beauty blog of the same name, which published personal accounts of using cosmetic products from 2008 onward and then stopped. Between 2019 and 2026 the same addresses were used by two unrelated occupants: an automated content generator, and later an online gambling operator.
What was wrong with it
Nothing, on the blog's own terms — this is a record, not a correction of anyone's error and not an update to a rule. It exists because a reader arriving from a 2011 link is owed an explanation on the page rather than a silent substitution. The blog is not continued here. We are not its author, we have no connection to whoever wrote it, and none of its writing is reproduced anywhere on this site. The two later occupants have nothing to do with this site either.
What it says now
The Cosmetic Record, an English-language site that does not test products and attaches a document to every factual claim. Addresses from the 2008–2016 blog are forwarded to whichever article here answers the same underlying question; where there is no close match they go to the article index, which is why that index keeps the Portuguese path /artigos/. Addresses created by the two later occupants deliberately do not resolve. The full account is on About. The table below lists where the forwarded addresses go.
Which legacy addresses were forwarded where, at launch on 2026-08-06.
Addresses from the 2008–2016 blog Where they go now Why that destination
/2010/10/desamarelando-o-loiro… and the rest of the de-yellowing, toning and colour-remover posts Purple Shampoo Does Not Remove Brass. It Covers It. The largest cluster of inbound links on the domain asks one question — why bleached blonde keeps going yellow — and that article answers it.
The copper and shade-code posts: /2012/03/entendendo-os-acobreados-da-tintura.html, the Igora and Wella shade-number posts, the multi-year red-hair series There Is No Standard Behind the Hair-Colour Number Chart They are all about what a shade number means, which turns out to be a question about whether a standard exists.
Masks, oils, reconstruction and cronograma capilar posts, including the February 2011 argan-oil post Argan Oil Does Not Repair Hair — and “Repair” Is Not a Regulated Word Same underlying question: what a treatment can and cannot do to a fibre, and what “repair” commits a manufacturer to.
Brush and applicator posts; thermal-water posts The named sections Applicators are not cosmetics and “Aqua”, thermal spring water and Latin binomials A section anchor that a redirect points at is an address, not a heading, and those two are treated as permanent.
/category/cabelos and /search/label/cabelos Hair colour and hair treatment A topic archive deserves a topic index, not the general one.
/p/sobre-o-blog.html, /p/autora.html, and the old first-person Testei archive About The archive of first-person product write-ups resolves to the page explaining that this site does not test products. It is the most honest mapping in the file.
/p/faq.html How we source The nearest thing here to an explanation of how the site works.
/p/contato_30.html, /p/participe.html Contact Like for like. Note that the address /contact-us is not ours and does not resolve.
/p/anuncie-no-testando.html, the old “advertise here” page About Someone following the blog's old business page is looking for whoever runs the site now, and About is where that is recorded.
/feeds/*, /rss.xml, /atom.xml The Atom feed A feed reader that has been polling since 2012 gets a working feed back.
Every other genuine post address dated 2008 to 2016, and the month archives The article index Roughly nine hundred addresses have no close match here. The index is grouped hair first, which is what the archive was mostly about.
Addresses created by the two later occupants, 2019–2026 — the automated content, its tag and author trees, and the gambling paths Nothing. They return 404. They were never this blog. Forwarding roughly ten thousand addresses that were never written by anyone would be the abuse pattern itself, not a favour to a reader.

Recorded . Anchor: /corrections/#2026-08-06-launch